Governance

BeeCaution seminar on the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:16:56 +0000

full image

BeeCaution seminar on the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation

On January 18th 2022, the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation was discussed in an online seminar with academics and stakeholders.

The seminar was organised by University of Bergen's BeeCaution project, which is a spin-off project of the H2020 RECIPES project. BeeCaution aims to build a Norwegian network of actionable knowledge for precaution by engaging a Nordic audience in RECIPES' discussions on precaution and innovation. The seminar gathered 47 participants with different backgrounds, including students, toxicologists, NGOs, legal scholars, and representatives from public scientific committees.

In the first half of the seminar, a presentation on the precautionary principle in the European chemicals regulation (REACH)’ was given by Christina Rudén, professor of toxicology and regulatory ecotoxicology at the University of Stockholm. Rudén criticised the lack of precaution in chemical regulations in the EU. She talked about what she termed the “Seven Sins” of the EU's chemical regulation, including: that most chemicals are insufficiently tested, that mixed exposures of chemicals are ignored, that there is a structural conflict of interest and lack of transparency in regulatory risk assessment of chemicals, and that the PP is very rarely used explicitly. Rudén also mentioned some possible improvements in the newly proposed Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability as a step in the right direction. This strategy indicates better management of endocrine disruptors and mixture risk and improved transparency. However it remains to be implemented, cross-cutting legislation is still missing, and the structural problems of conflict of interest remain unaddressed.

Prof. Ketil Hylland, toxicologist at the University of Oslo, was invited to comment on Rudén’s presentation. Hylland agreed on the need of a precautionary approach. He mentioned uncertainty around prenatal exposure to low doses of chemicals as an example. He further suggested that instead of focusing on calculating natures tolerance levels of chemicals in risk assessments, the main focus should start from the question whether the chemical is really needed (essential use). Regarding the PP, he found it strange that when looking up the PP in the EU, most of the focus is on the limitations of the principle.

After a short break, the seminar was open to comments from the audience. Topics discussed include:

The problem of ‘paralysis by analysis’
A better testing regime is needed, that is more science-based instead of volume based
The problems of regulatory silos
What counts as ‘essential use’ of chemicals should be discussed more
More interdisciplinary collaboration is needed, especially legal scholars and social scientists need to engage more in debates and research related to regulation of chemicals
The problematics of setting specific thresholds, and that the PP is applied retrospectively
There is a window of opportunity to engage with the implementation of the new chemical strategy
Other relevant cases mentioned: Norway’s GMO legislation and the EUs prolonged process of updating the so called "Bee Guidance" for pesticide assessments

A video of Rudén’s presentation will be made available at the webpage of UiB's BeeCaution project soon.

Organiser

University of Bergen

Contact

Prof. Jeroen van der Sluijs
Email: Jeroen.Sluijs@uib.no

Further Links

BeeCaution project

Themes

Endocrine disruptors, Environment, Governance, Health, Innovation, Precaution, Regulation, Science

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia, Industry & Business, Funding Sources & Finance, NGOs & Associations

RECIPES Event

Event Date

18 January 2022

Location

Bergen, Norway

Language

English

Online conference on precaution and innovation in Germany and beyond

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Tue, 07 Dec 2021 14:49:40 +0000

full image

Online conference on precaution and innovation in Germany and beyond

On the 18 and 19 November 2021, the German non-governmental organization NABU organized the online conference “Vorsorge und Innovation - Fit for Future?”. The meeting was set up to discuss the relationship between innovation and the precaution principle. For two days, the conference gathered experts including academics, government officials, and industry actors.

On Thursday 18 November, after an opening by Michal Schäfer (NABU representative) and Dr. Carsten Neßhöver (representative of the German Environment Agency), Prof Andrew Stirling presented and discussed the current challenges for the governance of technological innovation. Dr Heidi Stockhaus the presented the results of the RECIPES project regarding the effect of the precautionary principle. She explored the legal status and current implementation of both principles in different legal orders. The presentation was followed by a comment by Ulrich Petschow.

On Friday 19 November, the conference continued, and Prof Sebastian Pfotenhauer discussed the role of the precaution principle in risk governance and innovation governance, for a responsible and sustainable innovation process. Dr Pia-Johanna Schweizer then presented the methodology and preliminary results of the RECIPES project, focusing on the co-creative approach.

The event ended with a round table discussion on precaution and its role for future innovation challenges, as well as its possible adaptations. Prof Christian Calliess, Prof Katharina Hölzle, Max Müller and Prof Martina Schraudner discussed different point of views and possibilities – considering the various stakes and challenges of innovation and precaution and suggesting conciliation possibilities.

Organiser

NABU

Contact

Dr Heidi Stockhaus, Ecologic Institute

Email: heidi.stockhaus@ecologic.eu

Dr Pia-Johanna Schweizer, IASS

Email. Pia-Johanna.Schweizer@iass-potsdam.de

Themes

Governance, Innovation, Precaution, Regulation, Safety

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia, Industry & Business, NGOs & Associations, Citizens & Civil Society Organisations

External Event

Event Date

18 November 2021 - 19 November 2021

Location

Online

Language

German

European Policy Workshop: “Precaution for responsible innovation”

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:26:38 +0000

full image

European Policy Workshop: “Precaution for responsible innovation”

On February 22 and 23, the RECIPES project will organize the European Policy Workshop: “Precaution for responsible innovation”.

The workshop aims to review the pre-final version of the RECIPES guidance on how to ensure the PP’s ability to drive responsible innovation. It will take place online and will address, as main target groups, EU policy makers, European agencies, EU policy support organizations and bodies and similar experts.

Participants will have the chance to discuss a pre-final version of the RECIPES guidance (Sent in advance to registered guests). A series of Break-out sessions taking place on both days will allow participants to discuss the guidance to further improve its clarity, plausibility, policy relevance and future-orientation, as well as to brainstorm on the exploitation of the document.

For more information, you can find the programme of the Workshop HERE.

The workshop will be moderated by the RECIPES partners.

Organiser

Dialogik, DBT, IASS with support from UM, KNAW, UiB, K&A and ARC

Contact

Frank Dratsdrummer, Doalogik

Email: dratsdrummer@dialogik-expert.de

Themes

Artificial Intelligence in healthcare, CRISPR-based gene drives, Endocrine disruptors, Environment, Financial risks and urban waste planning, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), Glyphosate, Governance, Health, Innovation, Microplastics, Nanotechnologies, Neonicotinoid insecticides, Precaution, Regulation, Safety, Science

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia

RECIPES Event

Event Date

22 February 2022 - 23 February 2022

Location

Online

Language

English

RECIPES Stakeholder Workshop

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Fri, 21 Aug 2020 14:11:47 +0000

full image

RECIPES Stakeholder Workshop

In June 2020, a diverse group of stakeholders met online to discuss the challenges of the precautionary principle and share their visions for the future of the precautionary principle, taking into consideration research and innovation.

Like the rest of the world, the RECIPES project has had to translate their activities into a reality affected by a pandemic. A planned face-to-face stakeholder workshop in Brussels was therefore replaced by a series of nine online meetings, which took place on 09 -12 and 15 - 16 June.

The objective of the workshops was to discuss and identify what the current implementation of the precautionary principle is lacking, but also share visions for a future that takes into consideration research and innovation. The stakeholders who took part from across Europe brought their deep knowledge on the precautionary principle and innovation, acquired either through academic research, policy work, working in civil society organisations or in relevant industries.

Despite the limits of meeting online, the stakeholders eagerly discussed the topic at hand, which led to many unique and important insights that will be valuable for the RECIPES project going forward.

The final workshop is planned to take place in September in Brussels. There, stakeholders will pinpoint barriers for their vision and what tools and guidelines could help ease decision making for lawmakers, and propose mechanisms for public involvement in decisions on research and innovation. Based on the stakeholder discussions, we will go forward to the next and final phase of the workshop and work on topics such as comprehensive and foresight decision-making, transparency, participation, and consistency.

Organiser

Danish Board of Technology (DBT)

Contact

Aske Palsberg and Søren Gram

aspa@tekno.dk, sg@tekno.dk

Themes

Environment, Governance, Health, Innovation, Precaution, Regulation, Safety, Science

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia, Industry & Business, NGOs & Associations, Citizens & Civil Society Organisations

RECIPES Event

Event Date

9 June 2020 - 16 June 2020

Location

Online

Language

English

UiB received supplementary funding for building an epistemic network in Norway on bees, pesticides and precaution

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Tue, 26 May 2020 08:45:09 +0000

full image

UiB received supplementary funding for building an epistemic network in Norway on bees, pesticides and precaution

On 17 December 2019, the UiB partner received additional funding from the Norwegian Research Council.
The funding is intended for Norwegian Participants in Horizon 2020 Projects. The purpose of the funding is to increase the impact of Horizon 2020 projects on research, society, and trade and industry in Norway. The UiB team received funding under this call for the project BeeCaution.

The background for the proposal was that the preliminary RECIPES project results showed that the Precautionary Principle is mentioned in many Norwegian legal acts and policy documents, but its use and application are still under-developed. This implies that there is an urgent need for state of the art knowledge on the recent international developments and discourses about the precautionary principle and its relation to innovation and RRI (Responsible Research and Innovation) in Norway.

The funding will be used to establish a network of Norwegian NGOs, interest groups, lawmakers, politicians, science advisers and academics and gather them for co-creation workshops that will both serve as a soundboard and source of knowledge and inspiration, and will be an arena to disseminate, reality-check and quality control RECIPES results. We will focus on the RECIPES case study on neonicotinoid pesticides. The co-creation workshops will give a wide range of relevant Norwegian actors access to state of art knowledge developed in our H2020 project through two-way engagement and dissemination at workshops and by translating the RECIPES Policy Briefs and key documents into Norwegian.

Part of the extra funding will be used to extend the RECIPES media analysis on the precautionary principle with Norwegian newspapers, increasing the relevance of the RECIPES project in Norway.

All in all, the supplementary funding will increase the impact, relevance, and applicability of the RECIPES results in Norway both when it comes to policy advice, further research, society, public understanding of the bees and pesticides controversy, and stakeholders in trade and industry.

Contact

Jeroen Pieter Van der Sluijs | Email: Jeroen.Sluijs@uib.no

Laura Elisabeth Drivdal | Email: Laura.Drivdal@uib.no

Further Links

https://www.forskningsradet.no/en/call-for-proposals/2019/supplementary-funding-for-norwegian-participants-in-horizon-2020-projects/

Themes

Governance, Neonicotinoid insecticides, Precaution

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia, Industry & Business, Funding Sources & Finance, NGOs & Associations, Citizens & Civil Society Organisations

Date

26 May 2020

Case Studies: Conceptual and methodological frameworks

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:52:58 +0000

full image

Case Studies: Conceptual and methodological frameworks

One of the RECIPES project’s aims is to understand and explain the differences in the application of the precautionary principle in 9 different case topics, in a way that reflects the particular context of the case and the arguments for invoking the precautionary principle.

In this video, Joe Rini, Research Associate at the IASS Potsdam and coordinator of the nine case studies, explains how the principle is applied in different contexts and thematic areas.

The Conceptual framework for comparative multiple case study analysis, part of the “Multiple case-study analysis” module, focuses on how the case study component fits into the overall RECIPES project, on the results of a literature review, on the case study methodology, and on the key risk properties of complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity. Together with the case study methodology, this report lays the foundation for carrying out the case study research, as well as the comparative analysis of the 9 case studies and transitioning these findings into the rest of the RECIPES project.

The goal of the “Multiple case-study analysis” is to perform 9 case studies and a comparison of the different cases in order to develop scenarios on the future application of the precautionary principle. This will feed into the design of new tools and guidelines for the precautionary principle in respect of reconciling precaution and innovation.

Each case study topic consists of different technological risks, at different stages of development and deployment, and with completely different legal frameworks. As a result, the project team developed a flexible methodological framework that allows the research teams to learn as much as possible about the case topic using the appropriate and relevant sources. The comparative case analysis employs a number of strategies including pair-wise peer review, iterating the analysis against case study researchers, and remaining open to the best way to compare and contrast the cases.

In this project phase, researchers seek to link the precautionary principle and innovation considerations to the key risk properties of complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity, which represent challenges for the understanding and the ability to communicate effectively about risk and innovation.

Complexity refers to the difficulty of identifying and quantifying causal links between a multitude of potential candidates and specific adverse effects. It includes the interplay of human agency within the context of regulation, innovation, legal decision-making, changing societal values, and vested interests, which result in higher-level complexity than the technological system alone.

Uncertainty is the key risk property in invoking the Precautionary Principle, as its purpose is to allow decision-makers to act despite scientific uncertainty (lack of knowledge about the outcomes or likelihoods, or both, of an event or process). In contrast, risk describes situations where possible outcomes are known, and the likelihoods of those outcomes can be described. Given the subjective complexity faced by decision-makers in the case study topics, the project highlights the functional uncertainty that emerges from highly complex technologies and societal processes.

Ambiguity refers to the fact that outcomes are potentially uncertain, and that different groups will value these outcomes differently. It is present in how scientists and risk specialists evaluate the same evidence, and in how outcomes as risks are evaluated. It implies the need to engage societal stakeholders in the discussion about the harms and benefits of technological innovations and other risks.

Part of this report also concentrates on innovation, as a crucial element for human and societal improvement, which must be regulated to prevent harm, thus leading to a complex interplay between regulation and innovation.

The Methodological framework for the case study analysis details the methodological framework for carrying out the case study research foreseen by the RECIPES project. The document serves both as a methodological framework – an explanation of what to consider in each section – and as a template for delivering the final analysis at the end of the case study research.

Authors

Dino Trescher

Credits

With thanks to: Project coordination by Maastricht University

Valuable input provided by the RECIPES research partners at Maastricht University, DBT, Rathenau Institute, and Humboldt University

Attachments

Conceptual Framework for comparative multiple case study analysis

Themes

CRISPR-based gene drives, Endocrine disruptors, Environment, Financial risks and urban waste planning, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), Glyphosate, Governance, Health, Nanotechnologies, Neonicotinoid insecticides, Precaution, Regulation, Safety, Science

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Research & Academia, Industry & Business

Case Study

Report

Publishing Date

6 January 2020

Language

English

Rathenau Institute meets the Norwegian Health Directorate and experts

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Mon, 02 Dec 2019 18:20:25 +0000

full image

Rathenau Institute meets the Norwegian Health Directorate and experts

Presentation of the RECIPES project

On November 25, 2019, the Rathenau Institute welcomed the Norwegian Health Directorate and about 25 of their experts to The Hague. This meeting was set up to exchange ideas about cutting edge developments, ethical aspects and policymaking in the area of medical technology, biotechnology and digitalization of health care.

The Norwegian delegation consisted of members of the Health directorate and a group of expert advisors, with a background in medicine, genetics, ethics and law. The meeting proved to be an excellent opportunity for gaining further insight into stakeholder views on the precautionary principle.

Tijs Sikma and Rosanne Edelenbosch presented the RECIPES project, for which the Rathenau Institute is conducting two case studies. Tijs gave the Norwegians a general outline of the project and presented the conceptual core of the precautionary principle developed during work package 1 of. He also presented the results of the successful dialogue meeting with Dutch citizens on the precautionary principle. Rosanne discussed the Rathenau case on new gene-editing techniques. CRISPR-based gene drives has been hailed as a ‘gene editing revolution’, making genetic modification more specific, easy to use and broadly accessible. The question is if these new technologies are in fact actually different from the old, or whether it is just the societal and political debate that has changed. By zooming in on different applications of CRISPR for human health, Rathenau will research how CRISPR is associated with risks that are uncertain, complex and ambiguous.

Caution was thrown to the wind by the Norwegians when they offered the speakers a ‘Norwegian’ gift, the cheese slicer. This demonstrates how Europeans can have varying cultural appreciations of technology, as any Dutchman will tell you they themselves invented this handy tool.

Organiser

Maastricht University, Faculty of Law

Contact

Petra Verhoef | Email: p.verhoef@rathenau.nl

Themes

Governance, Health, Innovation, CRISPR-based gene drives, Precaution, Regulation

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Regulatory Authorities & Agencies, Research & Academia

External Event

Event Date

25 November 2019

Location

The Hague

Language

English

Annual Meeting of the Germany Society of Scientific Research

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:53:58 +0000

full image

Annual Meeting of the Germany Society of Scientific Research

Phil Macnaghten sharing ideas about “Responsible research and innovation”

On 12 April 2019, Phil Macnaghten, Professor of Technology and International Development at the Wagening University, shared his ideas on responsible research and innovation with members of the German Society of Scientific Research.

This year’s annual meeting of the German Society of Scientific Research saw several presentations on responsibility of research. They focused on two questions: What can science contribute to society? What is the responsibility of science?

In his presentation “Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society”, Philip Macnaghten gave a brief historical overview of the concept and identified three features that are emerging from the discourse: (1) Identification of targets for innovation in an ethical, inclusive, democratic and equitable manner; (2) Integration and institutionalisation of established mechanisms of reflection, anticipation, and inclusive deliberation in and around the process of research and innovation; and (3) Conveyance of new responsibilities emerging from a model of co-creation.

During the discussion facilitated by Harald Mieg, member of the RECIPES project, the role of the precautionary principle, as well as the role of international standards, were discussed.

Organiser

Humboldt University

Contact

Harald A. Mieg | Email: harald.mieg@hu-berlin.de

Further Links

Programme

Abstract

Themes

Governance, Innovation, Science

Interesting for

Research & Academia

RECIPES Citizen meeting in Bergen (Norway)

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:57:13 +0000

full image

RECIPES Citizen meeting in Bergen (Norway)

On May 28, 2019, a citizen meeting was held in Bergen (Norway), where 26 people of different ages and professions met to discuss precaution and innovation in relation to (new) technologies.

On the day, a group of 26 people with different demographics met in Bergen to discuss precaution and innovation. The purpose of the meeting was to provide some insights into citizen perceptions of precaution and innovation. Similar citizen meetings were held in Italy, Bulgaria, Netherlands, and Denmark.

Before the meeting, a short informational material was developed by the RECIPES consortium and sent to the participants. The information material provided information on the Precautionary Principle (PP) and innovation, as well as the dilemmas and controversies connected to three selected cases: GMO, Nanotechnology, and pesticides.

In the meeting, the RECIPES project was first presented shortly, including a brief introduction to three of the RECIPES cases. Thereafter, participants filled out a survey on precaution and innovation in the areas of GMOs, nanotechnology, and pesticides, followed by group discussions of 10 of the questions in the survey.

The discussions were lively as participants included both those fascinated by new technologies and those who were more concerned about emerging risks. Generally, there seemed to be a agreement that PP and innovation should be balanced. However, regarding the question of prioritizing between the two, most of the participants tended towards a more precautionary approach.

Of the three cases, participants expressed more concerns about pesticides than about GMOs and nanotechnologies. Some controversies on GMOs emerged in the discussions. While many participants expressed worries about the developments of these technologies, some also highlighted the possibilities of these technologies and that the regulations in some cases may be too strict, holding back innovation.

Lastly, some controversies emerged around the questions on the possibilities of controlling technology. Participants disagreed about the possibilities to steer or regulate the development of technologies at an international level but mainly agreed that there are possibilities to direct innovations towards more sustainable directions on a national scale.

Organiser

University of Bergen

Contact

Laura Drivdal and Jeroen van der Sluijs | Email: Laura.drivdal@uib.no

Further Links

https://www.uib.no/svt/126821/møte-om-risiko-og-teknologisk-innovasjon

Themes

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), Governance, Innovation, Nanotechnologies, Neonicotinoid insecticides, Precaution, Regulation, Safety

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Citizens & Civil Society Organisations

RECIPES Event

Event Date

28 May 2019

Location

Bergen

Language

norwegian

Citizens meeting in The Hague

chiara.mazzetti@ecologic.eu — Mon, 05 Aug 2019 09:26:21 +0000

full image

Citizens meeting in The Hague

New technology: A conversation about precaution, safety and responsibility

On June 19, the Rathenau Institute organised a discussion meeting about how the government should deal with uncertain risks to public health and the environment in relation to new technologies. 40 people of different ages, professions and backgrounds came together in The Hague to exchange ideas. The meeting led to lively discussions about questions such as: how important is it as a society to be careful with new technologies? Can you be too careful? And who should be held responsible?

The discussion meeting took place in the context of RECIPES, a project within the European Horizon2020 Programme. Organisations from seven European countries are involved in this project. In May and June, research institutes in Bulgaria, Norway, Italy, and Denmark, organised a similar meeting around the same questions. The outcomes of these discussions are used to take into account the opinions, presuppositions and interests of society for advising the European Commission.

Working on safety of new technology
The RECIPES project started in January 2019 and will last three years. An important goal of the project is to investigate whether adjustments are needed in the European policy for testing and guaranteeing the safety of new technologies. The RECIPES partners work together with various stakeholders on tools for appropriate policy, in the form of, for example, guidelines that can help with the responsible embedding of innovations in society.

Risks and innovation
Innovation plays an important role in bringing new products to the market that can be attractive or even of vital importance to society. Examples are clothing that is water-repellent thanks to nanotechnology, genetically modified food crops that are more resistant to drought or new pesticides that can protect crops against insects. While these innovations can provide solutions to societal challenges, they often are surrounded by risks to human and environmental safety. For example, nanoparticles can cause problems for the respiratory tract and genetically modified crops may disrupt existing ecosystems, while some pesticides increase the risk of massive bee extinction. These three cases formed the starting point for the conversations on 19 June.

Why this citizens meeting?
It is important to include the views of stakeholders on innovation and precaution during the project. Not only the perspectives of researchers, companies, farmers and regulators, but also the views of users and stakeholders who often experience the advantages and disadvantages of new technology to an unequal extent. How should we deal with the tension between innovation and ensuring safety for people and the environment according to them?

During the meeting in The Hague, people discussed in small groups questions such as: how important is precaution towards innovation with new technologies? Can you also be too careful? Who is responsible for demonstrating that a technology is safe: the companies that develop it or the government? And how can we take into account all the interests of parties that do not have a direct representative, such as the environment or future generations? These issues sparked lively discussions among the participants. Prior to the discussion, participants completed a questionnaire in order to form an opinion about the topics of the discussions. The results from these questionnaires could consequently be compared with insights that emerged during the discussions.

Follow-up research into precaution and safety with new technology
The results from the meeting are bundled with those of the other four countries in a joint publication. In the coming year, the Rathenau Institute will also be working on two other cases in which precaution plays a role: genetic modification of organisms and artificial intelligence.

Organiser

Rathenau Institute

Contact

Petra Verhoef

Email: p.verhoef@rathenau.nl

Further Links

In gesprek over voorzorg, veiligheid en verantwoordelijkheid bij nieuwe technol…

Gallery

Themes

Governance, Innovation, Precaution, Safety, Science

Interesting for

Policy Makers, Research & Academia, NGOs & Associations, Citizens & Civil Society Organisations

Governance

BeeCaution seminar on the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation

BeeCaution seminar on the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals regulation

Themes

Interesting for

Online conference on precaution and innovation in Germany and beyond

Online conference on precaution and innovation in Germany and beyond

Themes

Interesting for

European Policy Workshop: “Precaution for responsible innovation”

European Policy Workshop: “Precaution for responsible innovation”

Themes

Interesting for

RECIPES Stakeholder Workshop

RECIPES Stakeholder Workshop

Themes

Interesting for

UiB received supplementary funding for building an epistemic network in Norway on bees, pesticides and precaution

UiB received supplementary funding for building an epistemic network in Norway on bees, pesticides and precaution

Themes

Interesting for

Case Studies: Conceptual and methodological frameworks

Case Studies: Conceptual and methodological frameworks

Themes

Interesting for

Rathenau Institute meets the Norwegian Health Directorate and experts

Rathenau Institute meets the Norwegian Health Directorate and experts

Themes

Interesting for

Annual Meeting of the Germany Society of Scientific Research

Annual Meeting of the Germany Society of Scientific Research

Themes

Interesting for

Tags

RECIPES Citizen meeting in Bergen (Norway)

RECIPES Citizen meeting in Bergen (Norway)

Themes

Interesting for

Citizens meeting in The Hague

Citizens meeting in The Hague

Themes

Interesting for

Tags